Associate Professor Anna Huang delivers the keynote address, “In Search of Human-AI Resonance,” to a capacity crowd.

She's bringing her insatiable curiosity to CSAIL as the new host of Building 32, a podcast from CSAIL Alliances.

Andrew W. Lo, MIT Professor in the Sloan School of Management, CSAIL PI, and Faculty Co-Director of FinTechAI@CSAIL, says, "The question is: `Do large language models have our back?’ The answer is no, not yet.” 

An increasingly common sight: robots walking down the street, surrounded by astounded onlookers. But these machines aren’t yet the do-it-all assistants you’d want working in a kitchen or factory, and a major bottleneck is data. Much like humans, robots learn best by experience. The challenge is that it’s labor-intensive and time-consuming to physically teach these machines so many actions across different settings. 

In his 1927 paper, “A law of comparative judgment,” the American psychologist L. L. Thurstone proposed that when people select one option among multiple alternatives, they are picking the one that has the highest value to them, even though they cannot assign a particular number to that choice.

Imagine working at a warehouse or office sometime in the near future, and you’re asked to help a new trainee learn the basics of their job. The catch: It’s a robot. To teach them, you might want to play a game of “show and tell” — that is, physically showing how to do something a few different ways, while also explaining what you’re doing.

For MIT Professor Armando Solar-Lezama, one of the most common misunderstandings about AI is the notion that it can be dropped into existing human roles like a plug-and-play replacement.

In 2026, the hype for artificial intelligence (AI) agents is louder than ever before. These semi-autonomous programs can “think” and execute well-defined tasks in areas like customer service and software development, typically using language models (LMs). But fields like medical diagnosis and scientific discovery require them to inquire about a vast range of solutions in uncertain environments, which LMs struggle with.

AI models are proliferating fast. There’s Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Grok, Mistral, Llama, and many more emerging every day. But which ones to work with? And why? We asked MIT CSAIL faculty and students which AI tools they’re reaching for right now. The responses showed a variety of preferences, a clear winner in one area, and a word of caution about what goes into any public model’s memory.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has said that AI could surpass “almost all humans at almost everything” shortly after 2027. While AI’s capabilities are certainly improving, such rapid progress might seem at odds with findings that show AI is still failing at 95%+ of remote freelance projects, and continues to struggle with hallucination, long term planning, and forms of abstract reasoning that humans find easy. But recent work from METR has found evidence that LLMs can gain capabilities in rapid surges — jumping from succeeding almost never to almost always in just a few years. If this is true across the economy, it could mean that workers could be blindsided by AI advances.